ANALISIS KESIAPAN INSTANSI DALAM PENERAPAN PAJAK NATURA  (STUDI KASUS PADA KABUPATEN BUTON TENGAH)

Ade Linda  Marshanda; Surianto  Ilham; Kartomo Kartomo

doi:10.35446/akuntansikompetif.v8i1.2061

Authors

Ade Linda Marshanda
Surianto Ilham Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
Kartomo Kartomo Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35446/akuntansikompetif.v8i1.2061

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the readiness of government agencies in implementing in-kind taxes in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Finance (PMK) Number 66 of 2023 in Central Buton Regency. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study type. Data sources consist of primary data in the form of interviews with government officials and academics, as well as secondary data from regulations, journals, and official documents. Data analysis was carried out using a descriptive-qualitative method with the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and verification. The results of the study indicate that the readiness of agencies in implementing in-kind taxes is still low. This is due to the lack of socialization from the central government, the absence of clear technical guidelines, and limited human resources and infrastructure that support the implementation of this policy. The efforts that have been made by the relevant agencies are still internal and have not reached the stage of effective implementation.

Keywords:

References

Achmadi, Abu Dan Cholid Nakubo. (2015). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta:

Pt Bumi. Aksara.Aryamega

Direktorat Jendral Pajak. (1984). Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor Se-03/Pj.23/1984. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Gunawan, I. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kulitatif Teori Dan Praktek Ed1 Cet4. Jakarta: Pt.Bumi Aksara

Jonathan, Sarwono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta. : Graha Ilmu.

Kartz, A., & Mankiw, N. G. (1985). How Should Fringe Benefits Be Taxed?. National Tax Journal, 38 (1).

Kementrian Keuangan. (2021). Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Kelima Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 Tentang Ketentuan Umum Dan Tata Cara Perpajakan. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Lexy, J. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Ramaja Rosda Karya

Mardiasmo. (2018). Perpajakan : Edisi Terbaru 2018. Yogyakarta-Andi

Mansyuri, R. (2000). Hubungan Kebijakan Pajak, Hukum Pajak, Dan Administrasi Pajak. Hukum Dan Pembangunan.

Nugraha. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 Tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan

Sugiono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Pt Alfabet

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wibowo. (2007). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ariansyah, H. (2022). Komunikasi dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Pajak di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 15(2), 87-102.

Irfan, M., Suryani, T., & Wijaya, R. (2019). Efektivitas Pajak Daerah: Studi Kasus di Beberapa Kabupaten di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Fiskal, 10(1), 45-60.

Meliani, S. (2020). Hambatan Implementasi Kebijakan Fiskal di Daerah: Studi pada Pajak dan Retribusi Daerah. Jurnal Keuangan Daerah, 8(3), 120-134.

Novita, D., & Sari, M. (2021). Ketidakpastian Regulasi dan Dampaknya terhadap Implementasi Pajak Daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 6(4), 75-89