This is an outdated version published on 2026-05-19. Read the most recent version.

The Influence of Audit Committee Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit terhadap Pengungkapan ESG: Peran Moderasi Keberagaman Gender

Pengungkapan ESG, Komite Audit, Keberagaman Gender

Authors

  • Fabio Bolanda Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35446/akuntansikompetif.v9i2.2771

Abstract

Pengungkapan Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) semakin menjadi perhatian dalam praktik bisnis modern karena mencerminkan komitmen perusahaan terhadap keberlanjutan dan akuntabilitas kepada para pemangku kepentingan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh karakteristik komite audit terhadap pengungkapan ESG dengan keberagaman gender sebagai variabel moderasi. Karakteristik komite audit dalam penelitian ini diproksikan melalui frekuensi rapat komite audit dan independensi komite audit. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain eksplanatori. Populasi penelitian adalah perusahaan sektor energi dan industri yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) selama periode 2020–2024. Sampel penelitian dipilih menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Data yang digunakan merupakan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari laporan tahunan dan laporan keberlanjutan perusahaan. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan regresi data panel untuk menguji pengaruh langsung karakteristik komite audit terhadap pengungkapan ESG serta peran moderasi keberagaman gender. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa frekuensi rapat komite audit dan independensi komite audit berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan ESG. Selain itu, keberagaman gender dalam komite audit terbukti memperkuat hubungan antara karakteristik komite audit dan pengungkapan ESG. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa keberagaman gender dapat meningkatkan efektivitas fungsi pengawasan komite audit dalam mendorong transparansi pelaporan keberlanjutan perusahaan.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abraham, M. (2025). Do the ESG performance metrics mitigate managerial discretion ? Insights from Nifty ESG 100 index. December. https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-03-2025-0027

Afifa, M. A., Nguyen, N. M., & Bui, D. Van. (2025). Environmental , social and governance ( ESG ) disclosure quality in developing countries : evidence from the ASEAN region. 25(7), 1728–1754. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2024-0102

Al-Sarraf, J., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Al-Hakimi, M. A. (2025). Board diversity matters: assessing ESG performance through the lens of firm size. Corporate Governance (Bingley), July 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2023-0495

Amara, N. (2025). Bridging strategy and sustainability : the impact of female audit committee chairs on CSR – ESG alignment in UK firms. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-01-2025-0021

Appuhami, R., & Tashakor, S. (2016). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on CSR Disclosure : An Analysis of Australian Firms. October, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12170

Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M., & Joyo, A. S. (2021). The impact of audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental , social and governance ( ESG ) disclosures. 21(3), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0243

Bananuka, J., Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Nalukenge, I., & Kaawaase, T. (2025). Internal audit function , audit committee e ff ectiveness and accountability in the Ugandan statutory corporations. December. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-07-2016-0062

Bravo, F. (2019). Sustainable development disclosure : Environmental , social , and governance reporting and gender diversity in the audit committee. April 2018, 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2258

Brighi, P., Della Bina, A. C. F., & Venturelli, V. (2025). Firm value and risk: how relevant are ESG factors and ESG controversies? Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, October. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2024-0953

Buallay, A. M., & Aldhaen, E. S. (2018). The Relationship Between Audit Committee Characteristics and the Level of Sustainability Report Disclosure (Vol. 1). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3

Cerciello, M., Busato, F., & Taddeo, S. (2022). The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability . Accounting for strategic disclosure. March, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2389

Cheung, K. Y. (2023). The impacts of business ethics and diversity on ESG disclosure : Evidence from Hong Kong. February, 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22644

Chopra, S. S., Senadheera, S. S., & Dissanayake, P. D. (2024). Navigating the Challenges of Environmental , Social , and Governance ( ESG ) Reporting : The Path to Broader Sustainable Development.

Council, C. (2025). The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting Evidence from banks in the Gulf. 21(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-06-2018-0085

Desoky, A. M. (2025). The in fl uence of board and audit committee characteristics on CSR reporting in Bahrain : the legitimacy perspective. 23(1), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2023-0743

Dixon, R. (2020). Determinants of Carbon Emission Disclosures and UN Sustainable Development Goals : The Case of UK Higher. September, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12324

Gezgin, T. (2025). Istanbul Business Research The impact of audit committee structure and members on voluntary disclosure sections in the context of corporate governance. 54(1), 1–22.

Hkimi, A., & Ftouhi, K. (2025). The moderating role of female directors in improving ESG performance through intellectual capital : evidence from GCC countries. June. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2025-0015

Jibril, R. S., Isa, M. A., & Hamid, K. T. (2025). Audit committee attributes , board of director ’ s independence and energy disclosure for environmental sustainability in Nigeria. 16(2), 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2022-0149

Lee, M. T., Raschke, R. L., & Krishen, A. S. (2023). Technological Forecasting & Social Change Understanding ESG scores and firm performance : Are high-performing firms E , S , and G-balanced ? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 195(May), 122779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122779

Maji, S. G., & Lohia, P. (2025). Stakeholder engagement, climate sensitivity and ESG disclosures in Indian firms: insights from a novel ESG framework. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, October. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2024-0139

Meqbel, R., Alta, M., & Abukhaled, A. M. (2025). Governance for a greener Europe : audit committee and carbon emission. December. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-10-2024-0719

Michopoulos, I., Bougias, A., Episcopos, A., & Livanis, E. (2025). Measuring ESG risk premia with contingent claims. In European Journal of Finance (Vol. 31, Issue 4, pp. 427–450). https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2024.2394550

Opuni-frimpong, J. (2025). Does audit committee matter for environmental disclosures amid crisis ? December. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2025-0139

Opuni-frimpong, J., & Ofori-boafo, R. (2024). Environmental disclosures and fi nancial performance amid banking crisis and COVID-19 : evidence from Ghana. December 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-08-2023-0498

Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory : Review of Theory and Evidence on Problems and Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467

Pozzoli, M., Pagani, A., & Paolone, F. (2022). The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states : Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371(August), 133411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133411

Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., & Rubino, M. (2020). Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality ? An agency theory viewpoint. July, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2635

Saha, A. K. (2025). Audit committee governance and climate change disclosures : regulatory reform and COVID-19. December. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-06-2025-0202

Sajjad, A., Eweje, G., & Tappin, D. (2019). Managerial perspectives on drivers for and barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation : Evidence from New Zealand. August, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2389

Senadheera, S. S., Gregory, R., Rinklebe, J., Farrukh, M., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2022). The development of research on environmental, social, and governance (ESG): A bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Environment, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2022.2125869

Seth, H. (2025). Demystifying the nexus of audit committee characteristics and sustainability performance. December. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2024-0434

Sihombing, T., & Nurhaliza, H. K. (2025a). THE INFLUENCE OF AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARACTERISTICS AND AUDIT QUALITY ON ESG PERFORMANCE WITH SUSTAINABLE GROWTH RATE AS A MODERATION VARIABLE. 9(3), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv9i3p3

Sihombing, T., & Nurhaliza, H. K. (2025b). THE INFLUENCE OF AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARACTERISTICS AND AUDIT QUALITY ON ESG PERFORMANCE WITH SUSTAINABLE GROWTH RATE AS A MODERATION VARIABLE. 9(3), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv9i3p3

Tumwebaze, Z., Bananuka, J., Kaawaase, T. K., Bonareri, C. T., & Mutesasira, F. (2025). Audit committee effectiveness , internal audit function and sustainability reporting practices. 7(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-03-2021-0036

Wedajo, A. D. (2025). Financial globalization and sustainability : examining ESG metrics and green innovation in Chinese firms. October. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-03-2025-0087

Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development , ESG performance and company market value : Mediating effect of financial performance. April, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089

Published

2026-05-19

Versions