DUKUNGAN MANAJEMEN PUNCAK MEMODERASI PENGARUH KAPASITAS STAFF TERHADAP KINERJA ORGANISASI

Authors

  • Dwika Lodia Putri Universitas Lancang Kuning
  • Reni Farwitawati FEB Universitas Lancang Kuning
  • Masirun Universitas Lancang Kuning

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35446/dayasaing.v11i2.2148

Keywords:

Staff Capacity, Top Management Support, Higher Education Performance

Abstract

This study examines the effect of staff capacity on the performance of higher education institutions (HEIs) in Riau, with a focus on the moderating role of top management support. In the context of higher education, staff capacity, which includes adequate knowledge, skills, and experience, is expected to improve operational effectiveness, especially in the areas of teaching, research, and services. However, the effect of staff capacity cannot always be realized without adequate support from top management. Therefore, this study uses Resource Dependency Theory (RDT) to examine the role of top management support in moderating the relationship between staff capacity and HEI performance. This study collected data from 382 lecturers at universities in Riau using simple random sampling technique. The results showed that staff capacity has a significant positive influence on HEI performance, with top management support serving as a moderator that strengthens the relationship. The findings indicate the importance of synergy between staff capacity and top management support in improving university performance. This study contributes to the education management literature by providing empirical evidence on the influence of staff capacity and top management support on organizational performance in the higher education sector

References

Alach Z (2017) The use of performance measurement in universities. Int J Public

Sect Manag 30(2):102–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-05-2016-0089

Aldhobaib MA (2022) Do subcultures play a role in facilitating academic quality?

—a case study of a Saudi Higher Education Institution. Humanit Soc Sci

Commun 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599022-01250-0

Ali M, Li Z, Khan S, Shah SJ, Ullah R (2020) Linking humble leadership and

project success: The moderating role of top management support with

mediation of Team building. Int J Manag Proj Bus 14(3):545–562. https://

doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-01-2020-0032

Amirkhani T, Aghaz A, Sheikh A (2019) An implementation model of

performance-based budgeting. Int J Product Perform Manag 69(2):382–404.

https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-05-2018-0171

Anderson G (2006) Carving out time and space in the managerial university. J Organ Chang Manag 19(5):578–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810610686698

Asif, M. and Searcy, C. (2014), “A composite index for measuring performance in higher education institutions”, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 31 No. 9, pp. 983-1001, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-02-2013-0023.

Asiedu, M.A., Anyigba, H., Ofori, K.S., Ampong, G.O.A. and Addae, J.A. (2020), “Factors influencing innovation performance in higher education institutions”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 365-378, doi: 10.1108/TLO-12-2018-0205.

Badri, M.A. and Abdulla, M.H. (2004), “Awards of excellence in institutions of higher education: an AHP approach”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 224-242, doi: 10.1108/09513540410538813.

Birdsall C (2018) Performance management in public higher education: unintended consequences and the implications of organizational diversity. Public

Perform Manag Rev 41(4):669–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.

Brusca I, Labrador M, Condor V (2019) Management accounting innovations in

universities: a tool for decision making or for negotiation? Public Perform

Manag Rev 42(5):1138–1163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1549086

Chenhall RH (2003) Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Account Organ Soc 28(2-3):127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00027-7

Chin W, Cheah J-H, Liu Y, Ting H, Lim X-J, Cham TH (2020) Demystifying the

role of causal-predictive modeling using partial least squares structural

equation modeling in information systems research. Ind Manag Data Syst

(12):2161–2209. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-10-2019-0529

Coupet J (2013) Historically Black Colleges and universities and resource dependence: a chow test of production functions. J High Educ Policy Manag

(4):355–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2013.812054

Davis GF, Cobb JA (2010) Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In:

Dobbin F, Schoonhoven CB (eds.) Stanford’s organisation theory renaissance, 1970–2000, 28. Emerald Group, Bingley, UK, pp. 21–42

Delone, W.H. & McLean, E.R. 2010. The Delone and Mclean Model of Information System Succes: A TenYear Update. Journal of Management Information Systems. Vol.19(4):9-30

Dicker, R., M. Garcia, A. Kelly, and H. Mulrooney. 2019. “What Does ‘Quality’ in Higher Education Mean? Perceptions of Staff, Students and Employers.” Studies in Higher Education 44(8):1425–41. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1445987.

Douglas JW (2000) Budget reform theory: a guideline for successful budget reform. Int J Public Adm 23(11):1967–1996. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690008525533

Egan M, Tweedie D (2018) A “green” accountant is difficult to find: can accountants contribute to sustainability management initiatives? Account Audit Account J 31(6):1749–1773. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-03-2017-2891

Fowles J (2013) Funding and focus: resource dependence in public higher education. Res High Educ 55(3):272–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9311-x

Franco-Santos M, Lucianetti L, Bourne M (2012) Contemporary performance

measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for

Research. Manag Account Res 23(2):79–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.

04.001

Griffin, Ricky W. (2004). Manajemen/ricky W. griffin diterjemahkan oleh Gina Gania – Ed 7, Jil. 1- Jakarta. Erlangga

Ghasemy M, Elwood JA (2022) Job satisfaction, academic motivation, and organizational citizenship behavior among lecturers during the covid-19 pandemic: a cross-national comparative study in Japan and Malaysia. Asia Pac Educ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09757-6

Guthrie J, Neumann R (2007) Economic and non-financial performance indicators

in universities. Public Manag Rev 9(2):231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/

Hagerer I (2019) Universities act differently: identification of organisational

effectiveness criteria for faculties. Tert Educ Manag 25(3):273–287. https://

doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09031-2

Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report

the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31(1):2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203

Haldma T, Lääts K (2002) Contingencies influencing the management accounting

practices of Estonian manufacturing companies. Manag Account Res

(4):379–400. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2002.0197

Heinicke X, Guenther TW (2019) The role of management controls in the higher

education sector: an investigation of different perceptions. Eur Account Rev

–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1619603

Hermawan, S., Sriyono, S., Hariyanto, W., & Fediyanto, N. (2019). Makna Pemeringkatan dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi Perspektif Intellectual Capital. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 142. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2019.v14.i02.p01

Hsu H, Liu F, Tsou H, Chen L (2019) Openness of technology adoption, top

management support and service innovation: a social innovation perspective.

J Bus Ind Market 34(3):575–590. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-03-2017-0068

Hu F, Li X (2019) Reflections on and countermeasures for the financial difficulties

of colleges and universities in our country. Stud Finance Account Educ

(4):50–54

Islam Z, Doshi J, Mahtab H, Ariffin Ahmad Z (2009) Team learning, top management support and new product development success. Int J Manag Proj

Bus 2(2):238–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370910949284

Jha S (2021) Understanding mindfulness outcomes: a moderated mediation analysis of high-performance work systems. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8(1).

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00708-x

Kholmuminov S, Kholmuminov S, Wright R (2018) Resource dependence theory

analysis of higher education institutions in Uzbekistan. High Educ

(1):59–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0261-2

Lopez O, Hiebl M (2015) Management accounting in small and medium-sized

enterprises: current knowledge and avenues for further research. J Manag

Account Res 27(1):81–119. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50915

McNab M, Melese F (2003) Implementing the GPRA: examining the prospects for

performance budgeting in the federal government. Public Budget Finance

(2):73–95

Melkers J, Willoughby K (2001) Budgeters’ views of state performance–budgeting

systems: Distinctions across branches. Public Admin Rev 61(1):54–64.

https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00005

Mizani H, Cahyadi A, Hendryadi H, Salamah S, Retno Sari S (2022) Loneliness,

student engagement, and academic achievement during emergency remote

teaching during COVID-19: the role of the god locus of control. Humanit Soc

Sci Commun 9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01328-9

Murdowo, D. (2018). In What Ways University in Indonesia as World-Class University Can Produce a Global Competitive Human Capital (Case Study: Telkom University). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 8(6), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijhss.v8n6p5

Parker L (2011) University corporatisation: driving redefinition. Crit Perspect

Account 22(4):434–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.11.002

Pilbeam C (2012) Pursuing financial stability: a resource dependence perspective

on interactions between provice chancellors in a network of universities. Stud

High Educ 37(4):415–429 Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organisational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408

Qiao C (2011) Research on the setup of accounting institutions and the configuration of accounting staff in colleges and universities—three discussions on the financial management system of colleges and universities. Educ Account Res 22(2):3–10

Richard P, Devinney T, Yip G, Johnson G (2009) Measuring organisational performance: towards methodological best practice. J Manag 35(3):718–804.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560

Sharifabadi A (2012) The effect of some contingent variables on universities’

accounting systems and performance management (Doctoral thesis). University of Southhapton

Wang S, Jones G (2020) Competing institutional logics of academic personnel system reforms in leading Chinese Universities. J High Educ Policy Manag 43(1):49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2020.1747958

Yaakub, Muhammad Hafiz, and Zainal Abidin Mohamed. 2020. “Measuring the Performance of Private Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia.” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 12(3):425–43. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-10-2018-0208

Zhuang T, Liu B (2020) Power landscapes within Chinese universities: a threedimensional discourse analysis of University Statutes. Camb J Educ 50(5):639–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2020.1754338

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25 — Updated on 2025-06-25

Versions