COMMUNITY-BASED ENTERPRISES, SOCIAL ENTERPRISES, DAN ORGANISASI SOSIAL LAINNYA: KERANCUAN KONSEPTUAL, IMPLIKASI AKUNTANSI, DAN KEBERLANJUTAN KINERJA PADA KONTEKS INDONESIA

Authors

  • Satria Tri Nanda Universitas Lancang Kuning
  • Afred Suci FEB Unilak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35446/dayasaing.v12i2.2860

Keywords:

Community-Based Enterprises, Social Enterprises, Social Accounting, Sustainable Performance.

Abstract

Abstract: Disagreements regarding the definition of socially oriented organizations are currently receiving considerable attention. Particularly in Indonesia, this conceptual confusion occurs between Community-Based Enterprises (CBEs), Social Enterprises (SEs), Cooperatives, NGOs, and Foundations. From an accounting perspective, these differing definitions of each organization result in unrepresentative financial reporting practices, invalid performance measurement systems, and accountability frameworks that do not reflect the organization's true needs. This conceptual article makes two main contributions. First, it clarifies the fundamental differences between CBEs and other forms of social organizations based on the literature and regulations applicable in Indonesia. Second, it identifies how these differing definitions directly impact accounting aspects across four dimensions (reporting framework, social performance measurement, stakeholder accountability, and organizational sustainability). This article argues that CBEs require a fundamentally different accounting paradigm than SEs and conventional nonprofit organizations. This is because CBEs possess unique paradigms related to social capital, group trust, and relational value as accounting objects.

References

Berkes, F., & Davidson–Hunt, I. J. (2007). Communities and social enterprises in the age of globalization. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 1(3), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506200710779521

Bhatt, P., & Altinay, L. (2013). How social capital is leveraged in social innovations under resource constraints? Management Decision, 51(9), 1772–1792. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2013-0041

Carnegie, G. D., Gomes, D., Parker, L. D., McBride, K., & Tsahuridu, E. (2024). How accounting can shape a better world: framework, analysis and research agenda. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(5), 1529–1555. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2024-2509

Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2014-0092

De-Villiers, C., La Torre, M., & Botes, V. (2022). Accounting and social capital: A review and reflections on future research opportunities. Accounting and Finance, 62(4), 4485–4521. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12948

Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010a). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053

Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010b). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053

Basavaraj, C. D., & Prakash, S. K. J. (2024). What Drives Social Accounting Research? Insights From a Bibliometric Analysis. In Environmental Quality Management (Vol. 34, Number 2). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22317

Grossi, G., Laguecir, A., Ferry, L., & Tucker, B. (2024). Accounting and accountability for managing diversity tensions in hybrid organisations. British Accounting Review, 56(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101470

Grossi, G., Vakkuri, J., & Sargiacomo, M. (2022). Accounting, performance and accountability challenges in hybrid organisations: a value creation perspective. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 35(3), 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2021-5503

Hisyam, & Lin, S. W. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of social enterprise literature: Revisit to regroup. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100411

Hussain, M. R., Szabados, G. N., Muhammad, K. Bin, Omarli, S., Murtaza, S. A., & Molnár, E. (2023). Examining the convergence of dominant themes related to social entrepreneurship, NGOs and globalization-A systematic literature review. PLoS ONE, 18(5 MAY). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283093

Iskandar, Y., Joeliaty, J., Kaltum, U., & Hilmiana, H. (2022). Systematic review of the barriers to social enterprise performance using an institutional framework. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2124592

Klarin, A., & Suseno, Y. (2023). An Integrative Literature Review of Social Entrepreneurship Research: Mapping the Literature and Future Research Directions. In Business and Society (Vol. 62, Number 3, pp. 565–611). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221101611

Kleinhans, R., Bailey, N., & Lindbergh, J. (2020). How community-based social enterprises struggle with representation and accountability. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2018-0074

Lee, E. K. M., & Chandra, Y. (2020). Dynamic and Marketing Capabilities as Predictors of Social Enterprises’ Performance. Voluntas, 31(3), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00155-y

Nanda, S. T., Juhaida Johari, R., Mohd Sanusi, Z., & Author, C. (2025). Critical Sustainability Insights in Indonesian Village-Owned Enterprises. In MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING REVIEW (Vol. 24, Number 1).

Nanda, S. T., Sanusi, Z. M., Morad, M., Hoque, M. N., Anugerah, R., & Mowla, M. M. (2025). Social Innovation and Sustainable Value Creation: Lessons from Indonesia’s Community-Based Enterprises. In Information Management and Business Review (Vol. 17, Number 4).

Nihayah, D. M., Pujiati, A., Rahman, Y. A., Nihayah, A. N., Nursaidah, N., Damayanti, A., & Ridzuan, A. R. (2024). Optimizing the Role of Community-Based Enterprises to Improve Performance and Competitiveness in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v25i1.23597

Ortega-Rodríguez, C., Martín-Montes, L., Licerán-Gutiérrez, A., & Moreno-Albarracín, A. L. (2024). Nonprofit good governance mechanisms: A systematic literature review. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 34(4), 927–957. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21598

Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). TOWARD A THEORY OF COMMUNITY-BASED ENTERPRISE. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.

Pilon, M., & Brouard, F. (2023). Conceptualizing accountability as an integrated system of relationships, governance, and information. In Financial Accountability and Management (Vol. 39, Number 2, pp. 421–446). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12323

Pradhan, S., & Samanta, S. (2023). Global research on community-based enterprise: a bibliometric portrait. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 17(4), 793–814. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-01-2022-0010

Pratono, A. H., & Sutanti, A. (2016). The ecosystem of social enterprise: Social culture, legal framework, and policy review in Indonesia. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.020

Salwan, P., Ajgaonkar, S., Neelam, N., & Venkatachalam, R. (2025). Resilience and sustainability of social enterprises: a systematic review and bibliometrics using PRISMA. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2493777

Sari, R. N., Junita, D., Anugerah, R., & Nanda, S. T. (2021). Social entrepreneurship, transformational leadership and organizational performance: The mediating role of organizational learning. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.28

Sari, R. N., Nanda, S. T., & Junita, D. (2022). Pengukuran Kinerja Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDesa) (1st ed., Vol. 1). K-Media.

Sharma, A., & Shenoy, S. S. (2024). Bibliometric portrait of the theory of community-based enterprise: evolution and future directions. In Cogent Business and Management (Vol. 11, Number 1). Cogent OA. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2315685

Spanuth, A., & Urbano, D. (2024). Exploring social enterprise legitimacy within ecosystems from an institutional approach: A systematic literature review and research agenda. In International Journal of Management Reviews (Vol. 26, Number 2, pp. 211–231). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12349

Tortia, E., & Borzaga, C. (2021). Social Enterprises and Welfare Systems. The Role of Multi-stakeholder Governance and Price Discrimination. The Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 9(2), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.5947/jeod.2020.007

Tortia, E. C., Degavre, F., & Poledrini, S. (2020). Why are social enterprises good candidates for social innovation? Looking for personal and institutional drivers of innovation. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 91(3), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12265

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 1992, tentang Perkoperasian.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2020, Tentang Cipta Kerja

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2004, Tentang Yayasan.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-14 — Updated on 2026-07-14

Versions