PERSEPSI KEPATUHAN PERPAJAKAN YANG DIPENGARUHI OLEH KEADILAN PROSEDURAL, KEADILAN DISTRIBUTIF, DAN KEADILAN RETRIBUTIF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35446/akuntansikompetif.v6i1.1279Abstract
Pajak merupakan sumber pendapatan yang paling dapat diandalkan untuk membiayai pengeluaran pemerintah. Pemerintah lebih leluasa menggunakan hasil pajak untuk membiayai berbagai kebutuhan dibandingkan dengan sumber pembiayaan lainnya. Kenyataan yang menyakitkan saat ini adalah pemerintah di Indonesia malah menghadapi banyak masalah dengan membiayai defisitnya dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Banyak warga terus menghindari pajak. Konsekuensinya, kepatuhan wajib pajak terhadap peraturan perpajakan yang berlaku menjadi tujuan utama pemerintah. Oleh karena itu, pemahaman tentang faktor pendorong kepatuhan wajib pajak menjadi topik yang penting untuk dikaji secara ilmiah. Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk melihat pengaruh faktor psikologis sosial yaitu keadilan prosedural, keadilan distributif dan keadilan retributif terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak terhadap 107 wajib pajak bukan pegawai di Kota Padang. Data primer dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan dianalisis dengan regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiga variabel masing-masing keadilan prosedural, keadilan distributif dan keadilan retributif berpengaruh terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak. Ditjen Pajak mengharapkan komitmennya untuk meningkatkan citra yang baik di mata masyarakat sehingga berujung pada peningkatan kepercayaan terhadap pengelolaan pajak. Sehingga kepatuhan pajak dapat ditegakkan dan dipatuhi secara sukarela.
References
Doyle, E., Gallery, K., & Coyle, M. (2009). Procedural justice principles and tax compliance in Ireland: a preliminary exploration in the context of reminder letters. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 8(1), 49–62. http://www.cipfa.org/-/media/files/policy and guidance/the journal of finance and management in public services/vol 8 no 1/jour_vol8_no1_d.pdf
Faizal, S. M., Palil, M. R., Maelah, R., & Ramli, R. (2017a). Perception on justice, trust and tax compliance behavior in Malaysia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.10.003
Faizal, S. M., Palil, M. R., Maelah, R., & Ramli, R. (2017b). Perception on justice, trust and tax compliance behavior in Malaysia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.10.003
Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2015). New Ideas in Psychology Tax authorities ’ interaction with taxpayers : A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust. New Ideas in Psychology, 37, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001
Gangl, K., Torgler, B., Kirchler, E., & Hofmann, E. (2014). Effects of supervision on tax compliance: Evidence from a field experiment in Austria. Economics Letters, 123(3), 37–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.03.027
Gobena, L. B., & van Dijke, M. (2016). Power, justice, and trust: A moderated mediation analysis of tax compliance among Ethiopian business owners. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.004
Hartner, M., Rechberger, S., Kirchler, E., & Schabmann, A. (2008). Procedural Fairness and Tax Compliance. Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(08)50010-5
Herman, L. A., Dewi, A. S., & Dewi, M. K. (2019). Perilaku Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Yang Dipersepsikan Melalui faktor Deterrence, Keadilan Dan Norma Sosial. Benefita, 4(1), 146–161. https://ejournal.lldikti10.id/index.php/benefita/article/view/3873
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225.
Mahangila, D. N., & Holland, K. (2015a). Analysis of Procedural and Retributive Justice in Tax Compliance. ORSEA Journal, 5(1), 113–160.
Mahangila, D. N., & Holland, K. (2015b). Analysis of Procedural and Retributive Justice in Tax Compliance. In Analysis of Procedural and Retributive Justice in Tax Compliance (Vol. 5, Issue 1). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2833521Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2833521
Mangoting, Y., Sukoharsono, E. G., Rosidi, & Nurkholis. (2015). Developing a Model of Tax Compliance from Social Contract Perspective: Mitigating the Tax Evasion. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(September), 966–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.128
Meşca, S. L. (2013). The Dynamics of Tax Compliance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92(Lumen), 535–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.714
Murphy, K. (2003). Procedural justice and tax compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(379–408).
Murphy, K. (2004). PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND TAX COMPLIANCE WORKING PAPER No 56 February 2004. Taxation, 56.
Saad, N. (2012). Tax Non-Compliance Behaviour: Taxpayers View. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.132
Sinnasamy, P., Bidin, Z., & Ismail, S. S. S. (2015). A Proposed Model of Non-compliance Behaviour on Excise Duty: A Moderating Effects of Tax Agents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(September), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.038
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Verboon, P., & Van Dijke, M. (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(120–130).
Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007
Wenzel, M. (2002a). Tax Compliance and the Psychology of Justice: Mapping the Field. Taxing Democracy, 41–70.
Wenzel, M. (2002b). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers’ identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 629.
