This is an outdated version published on 2025-06-24. Read the most recent version.

ANALISIS INFORMASI LAPORAN KINERJA KEUANGAN DALAM KEPUTUSAN INVESTASI/BISNIS PADA PT BPR SARIMADU (PERSERODA)

Authors

  • Toni Nurman
  • Absor Marantika STIE Bangkinang, Riau 28411, Indonesia
  • Zulher Zulher STIE Bangkinang, Riau 28411, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35446/bisniskompetif.v4i1.2222

Keywords:

Current Ratio, Debt to Asset Ratio dan Debt to Equity Ratio and Financial Performance

Abstract

The research was conducted at PT BPR Sarimadu (Perseroda). reviewed from the liquidity and solvency aspects using descriptive research methods and data collection techniques through documentation and interviews with the Board of Directors in the form of secondary data, namely the annual report of PT BPR Sarimadu (Perseroda), there was an increase in the liquidity ratio as measured by the current ratio in 2022 and compared to the internal average of PT BPR Sarimadu (Perseroda). which shows that the company is less able to pay off short-term obligations when they fall due. Although there has been an increase, the increase in the current ratio has not been significant so that it has not been able to change the ratio level to the standard point stated in the theory of this research, namely 200%. This results in the company being less secure in paying short-term obligations when they fall due or the creditor's position is still not secure in other words the company is illiquid. This means that the company's management has not been able to strictly supervise working capital items as evidenced by the large amount of short-term debt. PT BPR Sarimadu (Perseroda) is seen from the level of liquidity of the company as illiquid but seen from the solvency side of the company as solvable. PT BPR Sarimadu (Perseroda) is less able to maintain its liquidity level. However, it does not mean that investment in the company is not attractive, because the company can still maintain the stability of its solvency, in fact it is very good when compared to the theory in this study

References

Bank Indonesia. 1992. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan.

Jakarta

Bank Indonesia. 1998. Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan. Jakarta.

Sutrisno, (2017). Manajemen Keuangan Teori Konsep dan Aflikasi. Jakarta

Horne & Woehlowic, (2020). Prinsip-prinsip manajemen keuangan, Jakrta, salemba 4 Didih et al, (2018). Analisis Kinerja Keuanga, Jakarta

Brighana & Houston, (2020). Dasar-dasar manajemen keuangan, jakarta

Mc mahon at al. (2020). Analisis Laporan keuangan. Jakarta

Megadevi. (2020). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta

Lan Joe. (2021). Analisis Rasio keuangan. Jakarta

Sivakumar, (2017). Analisis Laporan Kekuangan. Bandung

Weygandt J Kimmel. P. & Kieso D, (2018) Accounting Principles. Jakarta

Lakada, Lapian & Taniwa, (2017) Analyzing the Financial, Jakarta

Andal, Sugaya & Shere (2020) Financian Ferformance Analysis, Bandung

Nouman dan Imran, (201) Kinerja Keuangan dan Nilai Perusahaan, Jakarta

Wahlen, Stephen Morli (2017), Financial Statemant Analysis adn Valuation, Jakrta

Al-Qur’an (Qs) Al-Baqoro

Al-Quran (Qs) Al-Humaza

Kieso, Weygandt dan Warfield, (2020). Bisnis dan Ekonomi,Jakarata

Pratama, (2018) Dasar-dasar Manajemen Keuangan, Yokyakarta

Van Horne dan Wachowicz, (2019) Prinsip-prinsip Manajemen Keuangan, Jakarta

Fahmi, Irham. 2019. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24 — Updated on 2025-06-24

Versions