KEMUDAHAN AKSES MARKETPLACE DAN KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN GENERASI Z: MEDIASI KEPUASAN PENGGUNA

Authors

  • Wirdayani Wahab Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Mahaputra Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35446/diklatreview.v10i1.2876

Keywords:

User Satisfaction, Purchasing Decision, Generation Z, Marketplace Accessibility

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of marketplace accessibility on Generation Z purchasing decisions by considering the role of user satisfaction. The research employed a quantitative approach using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS 4. The population consisted of Generation Z marketplace users. The sampling technique used purposive sampling with a total of 110 respondents determined based on the number of research indicators. The variables examined included marketplace accessibility, user satisfaction, and Generation Z purchasing decisions. The results revealed that marketplace accessibility has a positive and significant effect on Generation Z purchasing decisions. This indicates that ease of navigation, product searching, price comparison, and transaction processes can enhance consumer purchasing decisions. Meanwhile, user satisfaction did not significantly influence purchasing decisions. In addition, user satisfaction was unable to moderate the relationship between marketplace accessibility and purchasing decisions. This study implies that marketplace providers need to improve system usability aspects to attract Generation Z consumers. These findings strengthen the Technology Acceptance Model, which emphasizes perceived ease of use as an important factor influencing digital consumer behavior.

References

Chen, Y., Liu, H., & Zhang, W. (2023). Digital platform usability and online consumer behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72, 103245.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Iskandar, M. R., Stiadi, M., & Kurniadi, H. (2025). Gadget dan Generasi Z: Studi kuantitatif tentang faktor-faktor penentu keputusan pembelian di marketplace Tokopedia. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(4), 4907–4929.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2023). User experience and purchasing intention among Generation Z consumers. Electronic Commerce Research, 23(4), 1452–1468.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.

Priporas, C. V., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2023). Generation Z consumer behavior in digital

Rahman, A., & Putri, D. (2024). Marketplace accessibility and consumer satisfaction among Gen Z. International Journal of Digital Business, 9(1), 55–68.

Rasulong, I., Yuniarti, A., & Rizal, S. (2024). Generasi Z dan keputusan belanja online: Kualitas informasi, ulasan pengguna, dan mediasi kepuasan pelanggan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 8(2).

Ridwan, N. H., Musa, C. I., & Haeruddin, M. I. M. (2025). Key factors in Generation Z's online purchase decision making. Asian Journal of Management Analytics, 4(1).

Simamora, V., & Islami, P. (2023). Millennial and Generation Z online purchasing decisions on Indonesian marketplace. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 2(8).

Suandi, C. D., & Djakasaputra, A. (2024). Anteseden dan konsekuensi interaksi sosial dalam keputusan pembelian: Gen Z Tokopedia. Jurnal Manajerial dan Kewirausahaan, 6(2).

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Wang, T., & Lin, P. (2024). Ease of use and online purchasing decisions in e-commerce platforms. Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 18(2), 88–101.

Wang, T., & Lin, P. (2024). Ease of use and online purchasing decisions in e-commerce platforms. Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 18(2), 88–101.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22