ANALISIS VALUE FOR MONEY PADA EVALUASI KELAYAKAN INVESTASI INFRASTRUKTUR PUBLIK KERJASAMA PEMERINTAH BADAN USAHA SISTEM PENYEDIAAN AIR MINUM KOTA PEKANBARU (KPBU SPAM KOTA PEKANBARU)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35446/dayasaing.v8i3.960Keywords:
Kemitraan Pemerintah-Swasta, KPBU, Monte Carlo, Value for Money, Kelayakan.Abstract
Pemerintah terus melakukan percepatan pembangunan infrastruktur publik dengan segala keterbatasan yang ada, sehingga pemerintah memilih untuk melibatkan pihak swasta dalam skema KPBU. SPAM Kota Pekanbaru diharapkan mampu melayani kebutuhan air bersih Kota Pekanbaru dengan kapasitas 750 lpd dengan estimasi investasi Rp 750 miliar yang mencakup 5 kecamatan. Fokus penelitian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan bagaimana investasi skema SPAM Kota Pekanbaru dievaluasi agar tujuan pembangunan infrastruktur publik mencapai manfaatnya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif komparatif dengan studi kasus menggunakan metode Monte Carlo, Value for Money, dan T-Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbandingan alokasi risiko pemerintah akan menanggung semua risiko termasuk risiko peningkatan biaya operasional dan pemeliharaan sebesar 345.289 miliar dengan total 670.084 miliar, dengan pengadaan skema KPBU risiko biaya tersebut dialihkan ke mitra swasta. VfM yang diperoleh dalam proyek tersebut sebesar Rp589.537 miliar.
References
Hana, & Negoro, N. P. (2008). Value for money. Chemical Engineering World, 43(2), 2.
Ikhsan, P. N.-I. A. bt, Normapiah, S. S. bt, Kamarudin, S. N. bt, Salleh, N. F. bt M., Jafri, N. F. bt K. a, & Bt, nd M. N. (2016). Public Private Partnership (Ppp) in Surabaya, Indonesia: Issues, Challenges and Strategies. 15th Management in Construction Researchers’Association (Micra) Annual Conference 2016 PUBLIC, 1–12.
Jefry, A., Sagita, L., & Permana, A. (2018). The Implementation of Value for Money Quantitative Analysis on Infrastructure Projects in Indonesia. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management, 1(01), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.35166/jipm.101.0004
Joubert, M. B. (2018). Faktor-faktor Sukese Penerapan KPBU Sebagai Suber Pembiayaan Infrastruktur : Suatu Kajian. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan Inovasi, 5(1), 49–63.
Kaukab, M. E., & Yuwono, W. (2019). Strategi Pengawasan Kinerja dalam Mewujudkan Perbaikan Kebijakan dan Rencana Investasi pada Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum. 1–10.
Morallos, D., Amekudzi, A., Ross, C., & Meyer, M. (2009). Value for money analysis in U.S. transportation public-private partnerships. Transportation Research Record, 2115, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/2115-04
Oktaviani, P. P., Muhtar, E. A., & Karlina, N. (2020). Public-Private Partnership in Water Supply of DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 4(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v4i1.27214
Pangeran, M. H. (2018). Alternatif Model Multi Kriteria. December, 1–8.
Purnomo, D. A., Yulianta, Utomo, D. P., & Sucipto. (2020). The Selection Of PPP Type Through Value For Money Analysis: A Case Study Of Jakarta-Surabaya Railway Project. CSID Journal of Infrastructure Development, 3(1), 75–92.
Putra, A. P. (2016). Model Public Private Partnership Pada Pengelolaan Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum Umbulan dI Jawa Timur Dalam Konteks Open Government. 1(May), 31–48.
Qu, Y., & Loosemore, M. (2013). A meta-analysis of opportunistic behaviour in public-private partnerships: Manifestations and antecedents. Proceedings 29th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, ARCOM 2013, September, 415–424.
Rahman, H. Z., Perwitasari, D., & Andreas, A. (2018). The Impact of LRT Batam Technology Selection Feasibulity Analysis. Journal of Sustainable City and Urban Development, 1(1), 105–112.
Schmitz, P. W. (2017). Incomplete contracts, shared ownership, and investment incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 144, 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.021
Shrestha, A., Tamošaitiene, J., Martek, I., Hosseini, M. R., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). A principal-agent theory perspective on PPP risk allocation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(22), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226455
Surachman, E. N., Handayani, D., Suhendra, M., & Prabowo, S. (2020). Critical Success Factors on PPP Water Project in a Developing Country: Evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.1071
Sutantiningrum, K. H., Rejeki, S., & Utami, L. (2019). Strategi Mitigasi Risiko Proyek KPBU Pembangunan SPAM Regional : Studi Kasus SPAM Regional Wosusokas Provinsi Jawa Tengah Risk Mitigation Strategy for the Project of KPBU Development on Regional SPAM : A Case Study of Regional SPAM on Wosusokas , Central. 2, 462–470.
Utomo, C., Adihardjo, R. B., & Sutantio, A. (2018). Feasibility Analysis Offtake CANDI from the UMBULAN Drinking water Supply System. 3(4), 655–661.
Wahyuni, P. I., Suranata, putu gede, & Triswandana, P. G. E. (2019). Kajian Manajemen Risiko dalam Proyek Kerjasama Pemerintah Swasta (KPS)/ Kerjasama Pemerintah Badan Usaha (KPBU) dengan Menggunakan Metode House Of Risk (HOR) Putu. I(September), 19–21.
Wibowo, A. (2016). Penjaminan infrastruktur. Sader 2000, 26–27.
Ikhsan, P. N.-I. A. bt, Normapiah, S. S. bt, Kamarudin, S. N. bt, Salleh, N. F. bt M., Jafri, N. F. bt K. a, & Bt, nd M. N. (2016). Public Private Partnership (Ppp) in Surabaya, Indonesia: Issues, Challenges and Strategies. 15th Management in Construction Researchers’Association (Micra) Annual Conference 2016 PUBLIC, 1–12.
Jefry, A., Sagita, L., & Permana, A. (2018). The Implementation of Value for Money Quantitative Analysis on Infrastructure Projects in Indonesia. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management, 1(01), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.35166/jipm.101.0004
Joubert, M. B. (2018). Faktor-faktor Sukese Penerapan KPBU Sebagai Suber Pembiayaan Infrastruktur : Suatu Kajian. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan Inovasi, 5(1), 49–63.
Kaukab, M. E., & Yuwono, W. (2019). Strategi Pengawasan Kinerja dalam Mewujudkan Perbaikan Kebijakan dan Rencana Investasi pada Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum. 1–10.
Morallos, D., Amekudzi, A., Ross, C., & Meyer, M. (2009). Value for money analysis in U.S. transportation public-private partnerships. Transportation Research Record, 2115, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/2115-04
Oktaviani, P. P., Muhtar, E. A., & Karlina, N. (2020). Public-Private Partnership in Water Supply of DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 4(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v4i1.27214
Pangeran, M. H. (2018). Alternatif Model Multi Kriteria. December, 1–8.
Purnomo, D. A., Yulianta, Utomo, D. P., & Sucipto. (2020). The Selection Of PPP Type Through Value For Money Analysis: A Case Study Of Jakarta-Surabaya Railway Project. CSID Journal of Infrastructure Development, 3(1), 75–92.
Putra, A. P. (2016). Model Public Private Partnership Pada Pengelolaan Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum Umbulan dI Jawa Timur Dalam Konteks Open Government. 1(May), 31–48.
Qu, Y., & Loosemore, M. (2013). A meta-analysis of opportunistic behaviour in public-private partnerships: Manifestations and antecedents. Proceedings 29th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, ARCOM 2013, September, 415–424.
Rahman, H. Z., Perwitasari, D., & Andreas, A. (2018). The Impact of LRT Batam Technology Selection Feasibulity Analysis. Journal of Sustainable City and Urban Development, 1(1), 105–112.
Schmitz, P. W. (2017). Incomplete contracts, shared ownership, and investment incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 144, 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.021
Shrestha, A., Tamošaitiene, J., Martek, I., Hosseini, M. R., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). A principal-agent theory perspective on PPP risk allocation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(22), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226455
Surachman, E. N., Handayani, D., Suhendra, M., & Prabowo, S. (2020). Critical Success Factors on PPP Water Project in a Developing Country: Evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.1071
Sutantiningrum, K. H., Rejeki, S., & Utami, L. (2019). Strategi Mitigasi Risiko Proyek KPBU Pembangunan SPAM Regional : Studi Kasus SPAM Regional Wosusokas Provinsi Jawa Tengah Risk Mitigation Strategy for the Project of KPBU Development on Regional SPAM : A Case Study of Regional SPAM on Wosusokas , Central. 2, 462–470.
Utomo, C., Adihardjo, R. B., & Sutantio, A. (2018). Feasibility Analysis Offtake CANDI from the UMBULAN Drinking water Supply System. 3(4), 655–661.
Wahyuni, P. I., Suranata, putu gede, & Triswandana, P. G. E. (2019). Kajian Manajemen Risiko dalam Proyek Kerjasama Pemerintah Swasta (KPS)/ Kerjasama Pemerintah Badan Usaha (KPBU) dengan Menggunakan Metode House Of Risk (HOR) Putu. I(September), 19–21.
Wibowo, A. (2016). Penjaminan infrastruktur. Sader 2000, 26–27.
